Today's headlines are full of the five bombs mailed to prominent Democrats -- and a former CIA official at CNN's office -- all of which were caught by their own security teams. The bombs were apparently real, but didn't go off, not one of them. As an old revolutionary myself, I find this intriguing. The bombs were obviously made by a professional, with plenty of experience in explosives and demolition -- but wouldn't such a professional have considered that nowadays high-profile targets do have expert security teams? That in itself makes me wonder, as does the timing: early in Election Week.
And of course the Democrats and their sympathetic media are blaming it all on Trump, with his "violent and divisive rhetoric" -- not to mention his accusing them of using "divisive rhetoric". And of course that's true; Maxine Waters -- one of the abortive targets -- has made herself famous over the past several weeks for noisily urging all good Parlor Pinks to go out and harass Republicans at home and in public -- which a lot of them then did, as plenty of videos on YouTube can show.
I'm not ruling out to possibility that this bomb-scare could be a covert Democrat-planned False Flag attack. The gods know, I've seen them before.
And I'm not the only one with suspicions:
Mainstream Media Ignores Poignant Piece of Bomb Maker’s Puzzle
In their never-ending
quest to demonize conservatives, the corporate media is willfully ignoring an important piece of the puzzle.
There is a major point being overlooked by the mainstream media during today’s attempted bombing spree of political entities.
Television’s corporate media are focusing heavily on the Trump-connection in todays’ incidents, repeatedly reminding the world that all of those affected by the delivery of these dangerous devices are people who have criticized Donald Trump in the past. The problem with this logic is that it is completely one-sided, at least according to reality.
We cannot forget that men such as Ted Cruz and Rand Paul were also major critics of the President at one point.
The
insinuation that these bombings are aimed solely to those who oppose the
President isn’t the full picture here, and I’ll explain.
First, those who have so far been
targeted are not just democrats
or liberals. They are globalists,
each and every one of them. For George Soros to be targeted first, and
then this slew of other students of his, is a substantial piece of the puzzle
that few in the corporate media are willing to talk about. The bomber or
bombers has not gone after your everyday democrats, or even the democratic
socialists who oppose Trump.
They’ve
spared Bernie Sanders and Alexnadria Ocasio-Cortez, and that is significant.
Also, every one of these devices had the same phony return
address: That of former DNC head Debbie Wassermann Schultz.
CNN reports that the
package bombs had the (fake) return address of "Debbie
Wasserman-Schultz," and there was a package that was addressed to Eric
Holder, but it had the wrong address and was sent "back" to
Wasserman-Schultz's office in FL, prompting evacuation of her office.
— Peter Sterne (@petersterne) October 24, 2018
What
does this mean?
Schultz was the DNC head
fired for her role in stealing the 2016 from Bernie Sanders and allowing
Hillary Clinton to effectively take over the organization. She was
blackballed for her role in the process, and shunned from politics as a whole.
Democratic citizens were furious with
Schultz’s actions, believing that they shattered the sanctity of the democratic
process in favor of pushing Clinton, a known globalist and friend of George
Soros, over Bernie Sanders – a man that many believed had a better shot of
defeating Trump in a general election.
By putting Debbie Wassermann-Schultz down
as the “return address” on these bombs, this terrorist could very easily be
attempting to make a political point about how these democrats and globalists
have completely ruined the idea of American liberty. Schultz annihilated the political process on the left, and
essentially handed the presidency to Donald Trump by pushing forward with the
nomination of Hillary Clinton – a candidate who was not only flawed, but
polling poorly against Trump at the time of their scheme’s hatching.
Essentially,
Schultz ruined the democrats’ chances to ever regain the trust of the American
people. These devices, with their premeditated return addresses, could be
certainly be attempting to reiterate that point on a national scale.
Remember folks, these bombs have not been proven to be targeting
anti-Trump forces. All we know now is that they are targeting globalist
democrats with a return address belonging to the woman who single-handedly
sabotaged the entire DNC in 2016.
--David West
Was that the equivalent of the severed horse's head in "The Godfather"?
The devil is in the details, and there are a lot of smoky details here. I doubt if they'll be revealed before the end of Election Week, but then, a lot of voters are suspicious already. And then there are all the voters who have voted already, early, by mail.
If there's anything the 2016 election taught us, it's that the voters are not so manipulable or predictable as the experts think.
--Leslie <;)))><
(P.S. Sorry about the ad below; I couldn't get rid of the damn thing.)
(P.S. Sorry about the ad below; I couldn't get rid of the damn thing.)