It’s been a lively couple of weeks in for the mainstream news. First, the second debate of the Democratic presidential hopefuls revealed some amazing planned policies. Second, a teenaged lunatic shot up the Gilroy Garlic Festival, killing three people plus himself. Third, a vicious young punk shot up a packed Walmart in
, killing 22 people before he
surrendered. Fourth, the next day, another
vicious young punk shot up a shopping mall and bar in El Paso, Texas . Fifth, during those same two days 47 people
were shot in Dayton, Ohio ,
by different shooters and at different specific locations. Sixth, a vicious gang-banger killed four
people during a two-hour stabbing spree in Chicago .
Seventh, the Democrat hopefuls, and their allies, responded to the
tragedies with even more amazing accusations and threatened policies. Los Angeles
To start with the end, various Democrat pundits pulled out their usual boilerplate about gun control, demanding:
1) “universal background checks” – which already exist. Federal law requires all licensed gun-dealers, whether in their shops or at a “gun show”, to check potential buyers’ ID against the NCIS database to see if said buyers have criminal records or have been adjudicated “mentally incompetent”. Private sellers – say, a neighbor selling his spare shotgun to another neighbor, or a grandfather giving a basic .22 bolt-action rifle to his grandson – are not allowed to perform background checks, even if they want to, because (thanks to a law passed by the dear old ACLU) they’re legally forbidden to access the NCIS database. All that’s needed to make “background checks” truly “universal” is to abolish that stupid law and let private citizens us the NCIS database.
2) “red flag laws” – which have been judged unconstitutional. Allowing police to confiscate people’s property (in this case firearms) without due process of law, purely on the complaint of anybody (such as an ex with a grudge) that so-and-so is “crazy and dangerous” is a wide-open invitation for abuse.
3) Ban the sale of “military-style assault weapons” and “extended magazines”, which are definitions so vague as to be unenforceable.
…and these are the more reasonable demands. Others include banning all semi-automatic firearms, house-to-house searches to collect them, and declaring all Republican voters “mentally unfit” to buy guns.
And it gets crazier. Of course one could expect Democrats to blame every tragedy on Trump and his “divisive rhetoric”, but singer John Legend claims that the president’s “racist venom” and “bigoted policies” directly “inspire killers”; this is ironic, considering that Legend himself has publicly called on people to harass Trump officials, and do anything to throw “flaming racist…piece of shit” Trump out of office.
Never mind Maxine Waters’ exhortations of the past year for civilians to go out and harass Trump voters everywhere in public – “in restaurants, in department stores, and in gas stations” -- which many Democrat voters have faithfully gone and done. She has never been charged with “incitement to public violence”.
And more: Reza Aslan, former CNN executive went on TV to claim “The President is a white nationalist terror leader. His supporters – ALL OF THEM – are by definition white nationalist terror supporters. The MAGA hat is a KKK hood. And this evil racist scourge must be eradicated from society.” Considering that some 40 million citizens voted for Trump, this could be considered “divisive rhetoric”.
Wilder yet, MSNBC’s national security analyst Malcolm Nance claimed on the program “Hardball” that mass shootings in the
by “far-right white supremacist ideology by shooters who want to eliminate
liberalism.” He insisted that “these
people feel that…Donald Trump is giving them subliminal orders in their
And more yet; Beto O’Rourke said of Trump’s “rhetoric”: “the only modern western democracy that I can think of that said anything close to this is the Third Reich, Nazi Germany”, and it’s issuing “an invitation to violence.” And MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski claims that in “inciting hatred, inciting violence, inciting racism…this is a president who seems to want these things to happen.” Nicolle Wallace, likewise on MSNBC, goes her one better, claiming “You now have a president…talking about exterminating Latinos.”
Princeton professor Edward Glaube,
on “Meet the Press”, said that simply using the phrase “illegal immigrant”
somehow “set the stage for people who are…on the extreme to act
violently”. Weirder still is former FBI agent
Frank Figliuzzi’s statement that Trump ordering the flags that had been lowered
to half mast raised again was a secret Nazi signal, because he happened to
order it on the 8th of August – and August is the 8th
month; since the 8th letter
of the alphabet is H, “the numbers 88 together stand for ‘Heil Hitler’.” It couldn’t possibly be, say, a commemoration
of Nagasaki Day, could it? That is, if
he thought of it at all.
The general theme of these claims is that Trump is a white-nationalist/white-supremacist/neo-nazi and so are his voters – all 40+ million of them. Right.
Now I’ll be the first to admit that Trump is a boorish lout with all the subtlety of a bull in a china-shop, that he’s very likely the reincarnation of P. T. Barnum – part businessman, part showman and part con-man – though a much worse speaker, and he’s probably the worst public speaker I’ve ever seen in public life, but where’s the proof of real racism? He’s quite fond of his Jewish daughter and son-in-law, boasts of his black friends, and – actions speaking louder than words – has done more economically, educationally and socially for People of Color than his predecessors. According to several federally-commissioned Pew studies, this year both Black and Hispanic unemployment hit record historic lows. Also Black and Hispanic rates of college graduation reached record highs. So did numbers of Black and Hispanic independent businesses. And never mind the educational, economic and social gains by American Asians. It’s an odd racism that has given such real advantages to “non-whites”.
So the usual claimed evidence for “racism” is Trump’s “divisive rhetoric” and the idea that the mass-shooters of the past two weeks are all neo-nazis who adore Trump.
To deal with the first, all of his claimed “divisive rhetoric” lambasts illegal immigrants, particularly the ugly M-13 gangster cartel, and certain Muslim-majority countries which have – according to the FBI and Interpol – nasty histories of funding, training, and supplying the majority of the world’s Jihadist terrorists; gangsters and terrorists are not nice people, and not the sort you want to welcome into your country, state, or town. There’s nothing “racist” about that fact. To restate the obvious, “Mexican” is not a race, and neither is “Muslim”. More, words are not actions; rude or thoughtless words are not the equivalent of physical attacks. In fact, professionally-offended Democrats – particularly Democrat Socialists – have used far more “divisive rhetoric” than Trump and all his working associates put together. The proof of that is the “intersectional” politics that have plagued our educational institutes for the past three years and more.
Now as for the second charge, the more the police learn about those incidents, the more complicated the story grows.
First, the Gilroy Garlic Festival shooter – Santino William Legan, 19 – drove to the park with a shotgun, an AR-15, a clown mask, a passport and several other odd items in his car. He cut a hole in the fence to sneak in, then ran through the park shooting people at random until the police came after him, whereupon he shot himself fatally in the head. Also found among his belongings was a “hit list” of widely different targets: religious institutions, political groups of both parties, federal buildings and courthouses. According to FBI agent John Bennett there was no manifesto but Legan was “exploring violent, competing ideologies” and “there was nothing that was all one-sided or the other.” He was not a “white supremacist” but a chaotic lunatic.
Then there’s the
shooter, whom the media have obsessed upon for
days, claiming he had left a “white nationalist manifesto” on the
Internet. The manifesto was quickly
taken down, but enough sites copied it to keep it available – such as here: https://pulpitandpen.org/2019/08/05/heres-the-el-paso-shooters-full-manifesto-read-it-before-you-believe-the-news/ El
The commentaries on the site are also well worth reading. But the point is, Patrick Crusius was not a proper “white supremacist”; he hated unchecked immigration, but his screed is also full of Left-wing tropes about “corporate elites” and overpopulation. He also mentioned that he didn’t like Trump. It’s understandable why the Internet platforms censored his manifesto; it doesn’t neatly fit the stereotype the Democrat politicians and their media allies wanted to spread.
Worse is the conclusion, by FBI agent Steve Hooper, on the Mike Broomhead TV show, that Crusius’ “triggering event” for the shooting was, if you please, an incident during the Democratic candidate debates. MSNBC personality Savannah Guthrie asked this question: “This is a show of hands question and hold them up so people can see. Raise your hand if your government plan would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants,” Guthrie said to the candidates Thursday night. Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Andrew Yang, Pete Buttigieg, Kirsten Gillibrand, Michael Bennet, Marianne Williamson, John Hickenlooper, and Eric Swalwell all raised their hand. Hooper claims: “When the most recent debate when they all said free healthcare, they all raised their hands. That’s what pushed him over the edge. He felt he was justified. He felt he ran out of alternatives.”
Less thoroughly mentioned in the media, interestingly enough, is the case of the
shooter, Connor Betts, whose
schoolmates described him as a Leftist bully who hated women. On his own Internet sites he described
himself as a Satanist, and an Antifa member, who wanted to kill ICE agents and
Republican voters, and signed his posts with “Kill every fascist”. He attended an Antifa rally last May, wearing
the usual face-mask and sunglasses, with a semi-auto pistol exactly like the
one he used in his shooting spree. The first person he killed in his rampage
was his own sister, and there’s no evidence that it was a random shot. Note the accounts at: https://lauraloomer.us/2019/08/05/dayton-shooter-satanist-member-of-antifa-despised-ice-interacted-with-left-wing-media-outlets/#.XUmQUJNKhBw Dayton, Ohio
All this, likewise, does not fit the stereotype the Democrats are trying so hard to push.
Other exceptions to the scenario include 47 people shot, 8 of them killed in Chicago, over the same two days as the El Paso and Dayton shootings, which the media avoided mentioning – possibly because Chicago has had a Democrat government for nearly a century, and has had fiercely strict gun-control laws nearly as long, and the perpetrators in all those cases were Black. So were most of the victims.
Another exception to the Democrat story was the mass-stabbing and robbery spree done by gang-banger Zachary Castenada, across
Garden Grove and , in a
scant two hours just last Wednesday, which left four dead and two wounded. The police who caught him claimed that he
gave no motive for the killings, though he had a long record of violent and
drug crimes. Castenada is Hispanic, as
were four of his victims. This case too
has received only brief and local media coverage, possibly because he used only
knives, although he had a handgun in his possession. Santa
More carefully ignored facts:
1) the vast majority of mass-shootings happen in carefully-chosen “gun-free zones” -- https://spectator.org/mass-shootings-in-gun-free-zones/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=df0dac76f6-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_08_07_11_41&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-df0dac76f6-104254389
2) The majority of mass-shooters in 2019 so far have been Black –
is not the world’s worst country for mass shootings, including civilian mass shootings --https://pjmedia.com/trending/no-the-united-states-doesnt-lead-the-world-in-mass-shootings/
So, no – it’s not Trump’s fault, there is no “surge of white supremacism”, the majority of voters are not neo-nazis, and the picture which the Democrats and their allied media have been crafting – and blatting on the airwaves for 20 hours per day for the last two weeks is false.
The Big Lie tactic was not invented by Hitler’s minions, but only made famous by them, and it can be defeated. I don’t mean just by repeating the verifiable truth by every available outlet, like little drops of water slowly wearing away the
Grand Canyon; I mean a weakness which is built into the
That weakness is the tendency to overplay your hand – to make sure that everybody hears the same story, with the same carefully-crafted words, spoken by the same carefully-groomed Talking Heads, accompanied by the same carefully-chosen weeping sympathetic victims, on every available media outlet, 20 hours out of every 24 for as many days as possible. For one thing, the audience tends to become bored. For another, once calmed down a bit, the audience tends to think about the story and notice the details that don’t quite fit, and then begin to think about other possibilities. Worst of all, with enough repetition, fear wears out.
I repeat: fear wears out -- and this is the doom of all tyrants, from wherever, physically or politically, they may hail.
This is why the Democrats are pushing to pass more gun-control laws – fast, fast, before the voters have time to calm down and think. This is also why wiser heads among the DNC are leaning on the fringey-er members of Congress to tone down their “rhetoric”, lest they cause a “backlash” that will throw the election to Trump.
Scariest of all is the possibility that the propaganda-jaded voters just may grow tired enough of the partisan squawking to turn on both of the Big Two parties and agree:
A plague on both their houses: vote Libertarian! To misquote Shakespeare even further, “’Tis a consummation greatly to be wished.”